The impossibility of unbiased judgment aggregation
نویسندگان
چکیده
LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website.
منابع مشابه
Premise Independence in Judgment Aggregation
Judgment aggregation studies how agent opinions on logically interconnected propositions can be mapped into a collective judgment on the same propositions, and is plagued by impossibility results. In this paper we study the central notion of independence in these impossibility results. First, we argue that the distinction between the premises and conclusions play an important role in the benchm...
متن کاملIndependence in judgment aggregation
Judgment aggregation is a rapidly developing research area in economics which attracts the interest of several fields, such as law, political science and philosophy [3]. It studies how the individual opinions of an agent, which are opinions on logically interconnected propositions, can be mapped into a collective judgment on the same propositions. Dietrich and List showed that judgment aggregat...
متن کاملA General Approach to Aggregation Problems
There is a new field emerging around issues concerning the aggregation of a collection of individual “judgments” of a group of agents. An individual “judgment” is represented by a set of sentences in some logical language. One looks for a procedure that has as its output a “social” judgment. A key result in this area is List and Pettit’s impossibility result [13]. By generalizing the well-known...
متن کاملThe theory of judgment aggregation: an introductory review
This paper provides an introductory review of the theory of judgment aggregation. It introduces the paradoxes of majority voting that originally motivated the eld, explains several key results on the impossibility of propositionwise judgment aggregation, presents a pedagogical proof of one of those results, discusses escape routes from the impossibility and relates judgment aggregation to some...
متن کاملJudgment aggregation: (im)possibility theorems
The aggregation of individual judgments over interrelated propositions is a newly arising eld of social choice theory. I introduce several independence conditions on judgment aggregation rules, each of which protects against a speci c type of manipulation by agenda setters or voters. I derive impossibility theorems whereby these independence conditions are incompatible with certain minimal req...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2007